| Can you spot the person with more power than the rest? Trick question - there is none! |
Every time I have a conversation with someone about the election - people are polarized.
I don't trust John Tory.
Olivia Chow will spend all of our money.
I'm afraid of Doug Ford - he's slimy.They always go back to the candidate platforms though - subways, child care, community housing repairs, road repairs - despite none of these candidates being able to further these goals without the support of a united council. Would I vote for Doug Ford if I thought he had the power to move ahead with his subway plan? Maybe - I like subways - my support for LRT's has more about their likelihood of being built, than their effectiveness when compared to underground trains.
Here's the problem - you (and most voters) don't really understand municipal politics.
We are all used to voting for a party, and a leader of that party that will have the power to move forward with their agenda.
When Stephen Harper runs his campaign based on lowering the HST to 12% - he has the power, the money, and the control to do that. You'll likely see those types of promises come to fruition in the years of a term (or you'd hope). Same goes for provincial politics.
Then it breaks down - and it's not made clear enough to residents - a mayor is not a position of power, but rather a position of representation. A mayor doesn't move agendas, budgets, or even items forward in council - they are more of an 'honorary' council member - that has the benefit of making appearances, and pretty well being the ultimate ambassador of any city.
Put it this way - Rob Ford voted against the most recent Toronto budget - but it didn't matter - the budget went ahead with most others voting in favour. So - before you get too excited about Olivia Chow's "decision" to switch back to a Scarborough LRT, Doug Ford's subways, or John Tory's 'SmartTrack' - know that none of those projects are decisions that any of those three will make alone. They will need to plead their case to their fellow council - like any other member - in order to get items voted ahead.
This is what I'm basing my decision on - the ability to bring council together for a decision. Who is the most well-spoken, who is the least hated by their peers, and who will act in a way that will represent Toronto the way I see our city.
So - how do we fix this?
To be honest - I don't think Torontonians should vote for their mayor, or if we do - the rules need to be stricter. If we eliminate a public-voted mayor, we would focus more on the councillors in our wards - who could then come together and elect (as a council) a representative to take on mayoral duties. THIS would be a democracy.
No longer would we have to listen to promises that could in no way be promised - and no longer would uninformed voters influence an election that affects more than they care about.
So....what do you think?


Creep Me
If you can see me on my social networks - it means we're friends, or I'm terrible at setting my privacy settings